Arapaho vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,624,266 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.854% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 853.7 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $52,081, a difference of 14.0%), householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $47,704, a difference of 8.4%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $33,806, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($67,965 compared to $67,879, a difference of 0.13%), median family income ($82,064 compared to $80,908, a difference of 1.4%), and per capita income ($32,345 compared to $33,279, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.7%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 22.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 1.0%), single female poverty (26.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and single father poverty (24.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 65.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 56.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (74.4% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 13.9%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.19%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.45, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 42.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 16.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.5%), college, 1 year or more (54.1% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.64%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 52.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 33.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.9%).