British vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 481,449,166 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within British communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.330% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British corresponds to an increase of 330.0 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,571 compared to $33,279, a difference of 39.9%), median family income ($108,705 compared to $80,908, a difference of 34.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,264 compared to $79,816, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,477 compared to $47,704, a difference of 7.9%), wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 17.6%), and median female earnings ($39,772 compared to $33,806, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 90.3%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 80.0%), and receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 77.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 23.0%), single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 25.6%), and single father poverty (16.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 33.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 66.6%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 60.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 56.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 6.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 43.9%), births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 39.5%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.0%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 38.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.0% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 3.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.0% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 70.3%), master's degree (16.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 65.0%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 34.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 32.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 12.1%).