French vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,700,417 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within French communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French corresponds to an increase of 34.2 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,685 compared to $33,279, a difference of 31.3%), median family income ($102,368 compared to $80,908, a difference of 26.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,824 compared to $79,816, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,230 compared to $47,704, a difference of 7.4%), median female earnings ($38,457 compared to $33,806, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $52,081, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 88.7%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 72.8%), and receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 61.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.7% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 19.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 22.8%), and single father poverty (18.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 55.3%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 53.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 35.2%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 33.6%), and births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.0%), family households (64.0% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 41.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 51.4%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 44.6%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.9% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 27.1%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 26.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and female disability (13.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 6.3%).