Immigrants from Canada vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 427,694,767 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from Canada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.592. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Canada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.623% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Canada corresponds to an increase of 1,622.6 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,412 compared to $33,279, a difference of 48.5%), median family income ($112,374 compared to $80,908, a difference of 38.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,402 compared to $79,816, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,411 compared to $47,704, a difference of 12.0%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 15.9%), and median female earnings ($41,373 compared to $33,806, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 84.2%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 82.3%), and receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 77.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 28.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 30.6%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 35.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 61.8%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 54.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 48.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 43.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.7%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 25.4%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 0.99%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 80.8%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 73.2%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 70.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 39.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 37.8%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 15.4%).