Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,660,103 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.350. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.074% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 74.1 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,529 compared to $33,279, a difference of 18.8%), median family income ($93,593 compared to $80,908, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,293 compared to $79,816, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $47,704, a difference of 0.44%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $75,647, a difference of 8.7%), and wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 54.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 51.8%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 15.1%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 20.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 56.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 51.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 28.8%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 23.0%), and family households (61.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.0% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 0.42%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 41.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 24.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.040%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 46.9%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 42.9%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.1% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.050%), 7th grade (95.4% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and 4th grade (97.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 61.6%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 52.0%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 12.6%).