Immigrants from Belarus vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,017,233 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.359% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to an increase of 359.2 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,303 compared to $33,279, a difference of 51.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,393 compared to $75,647, a difference of 42.0%), and median family income ($114,586 compared to $80,908, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 4.7%), householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $47,704, a difference of 16.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $52,081, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 74.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 69.6%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 67.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 12.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 21.1%), and single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 33.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 75.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 56.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 72.5%), births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 67.6%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 4.2%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 72.7%), no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 59.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 7.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 18.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 46.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 90.2%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 87.2%), and bachelor's degree (45.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 71.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 90.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 57.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.1%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 12.8%).