Immigrants from Western Asia vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 382,034,287 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from Western Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.181. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Asia corresponds to a decrease of 16.5 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,876 compared to $33,279, a difference of 40.9%), median family income ($108,691 compared to $80,908, a difference of 34.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,217 compared to $79,816, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 7.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,190 compared to $47,704, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,645 compared to $52,081, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 58.4%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 56.6%), and family poverty (9.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 19.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 25.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 25.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 52.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 50.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 57.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 55.7%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.0%), family households (64.1% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.45, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 23.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.92%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 82.9%), master's degree (17.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 75.8%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 69.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.040%), 6th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and 5th grade (97.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 75.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 47.3%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 10.5%).