Bermudan vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,899,309 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Bermudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.187. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bermudans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.298% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bermudans corresponds to an increase of 297.5 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,911 compared to $33,279, a difference of 28.9%), median family income ($97,577 compared to $80,908, a difference of 20.6%), and median household income ($80,406 compared to $67,879, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,359 compared to $47,704, a difference of 0.73%), wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,171 compared to $52,081, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 57.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 49.6%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 15.8%), single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 19.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 46.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 42.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 50.6%), births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 21.0%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.5% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple households (42.4% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 45.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 28.1%), and no vehicles in household (12.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.6% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 12.6%), and no vehicles in household (12.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 55.2%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 47.6%), and bachelor's degree (38.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 45.8%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 41.9%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.79%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.6%).