Immigrants from Belgium vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,313,904 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from Belgium communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.215. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belgium within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.194% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belgium corresponds to an increase of 194.2 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,082 compared to $33,279, a difference of 65.5%), median family income ($123,831 compared to $80,908, a difference of 53.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,932 compared to $79,816, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,830 compared to $47,704, a difference of 14.9%), wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 18.2%), and median female earnings ($44,587 compared to $33,806, a difference of 31.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 82.4%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 79.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 77.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 28.3%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 28.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 29.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 66.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 66.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 63.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 61.5%), births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 53.6%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.0% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 5.3%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.45, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 40.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 23.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 135.1%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 118.3%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 109.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 55.9%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 54.0%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (45.3% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.4%).