Latvian vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,343,480 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.415. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.298% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 298.5 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $33,279, a difference of 58.2%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $80,908, a difference of 48.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $79,816, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $47,704, a difference of 10.6%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $52,081, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 110.1%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 101.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 89.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 30.5%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 36.1%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 36.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 73.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 70.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 64.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 59.9%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 55.0%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 5.7%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 17.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.57%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 111.3%), master's degree (19.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 99.5%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 94.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.56%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.56%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 50.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 49.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.8%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 17.6%).