Australian vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,746,230 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.511% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 1,511.0 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $33,279, a difference of 56.5%), median family income ($118,440 compared to $80,908, a difference of 46.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,912 compared to $75,647, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $47,704, a difference of 12.7%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 14.7%), and median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $33,806, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 90.0%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 82.4%), and receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 79.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 22.4%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 29.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 35.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 62.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 59.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 47.3%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 45.5%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 5.6%), family households (62.8% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.23%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 99.2%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 85.2%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 44.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 42.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 16.2%).