Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,886,460 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from Sierra Leone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.302. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sierra Leone within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.069% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sierra Leone corresponds to a decrease of 69.2 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($88,498 compared to $67,879, a difference of 30.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,227 compared to $79,816, a difference of 29.3%), and median family income ($103,990 compared to $80,908, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,190 compared to $47,704, a difference of 13.6%), wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and median male earnings ($53,905 compared to $44,775, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 56.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 55.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 30.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 32.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 32.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 46.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 40.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.5% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.5%), births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 25.5%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.3% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 0.31%), currently married (43.8% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (64.3% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 21.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 64.1%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 51.0%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.1% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and 4th grade (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 64.6%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 54.7%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 12.4%).