Immigrants from Philippines vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,661,526 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from Philippines communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.085. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Philippines corresponds to an increase of 39.1 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,899 compared to $67,879, a difference of 38.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,910 compared to $75,647, a difference of 36.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,471 compared to $79,816, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 0.47%), householder income under 25 years ($57,930 compared to $47,704, a difference of 21.4%), and median female earnings ($41,114 compared to $33,806, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 80.0%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 77.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 73.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 30.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 36.7%), and single mother poverty (26.5% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 38.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 53.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 51.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 41.2%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 34.9%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.1%), average family size (3.37 compared to 3.45, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (68.3% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 22.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (36.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 38.4%), master's degree (13.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 37.0%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.7% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.17%), 10th grade (92.6% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 66.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 47.4%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.5%), disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.1%).