Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,578,260 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Immigrant from Nepal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.736. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nepal within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.081% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nepal corresponds to an increase of 81.0 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,322 compared to $80,544, a difference of 18.3%), per capita income ($44,187 compared to $37,464, a difference of 17.9%), and median male earnings ($55,615 compared to $47,177, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,843 compared to $61,000, a difference of 1.4%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,611 compared to $50,691, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 27.9%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 25.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.010%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 34.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 31.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.97%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.1% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.9%), births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 11.2%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.2% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 0.76%), currently married (46.1% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (62.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 35.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 17.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.62%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 61.6%), master's degree (17.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 57.5%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (95.9% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and 9th grade (94.8% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 34.2%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 30.0%), and male disability (10.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.16%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.5%).