Asian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,352,542 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to an increase of 7.8 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $80,544, a difference of 39.9%), median male earnings ($63,827 compared to $47,177, a difference of 35.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $87,864, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 10.2%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $50,691, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $61,000, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 39.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 38.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 36.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 17.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 23.0%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 22.8%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.3%), family households (66.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 12.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 80.3%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 71.3%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 70.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.0%), 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 37.7%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 32.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 6.7%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 8.0%).