Immigrants from India vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,789,573 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Immigrant from India communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.096. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from India within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from India corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($74,207 compared to $47,177, a difference of 57.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($124,238 compared to $80,544, a difference of 54.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($132,488 compared to $87,864, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($59,914 compared to $50,691, a difference of 18.2%), householder income over 65 years ($72,804 compared to $61,000, a difference of 19.4%), and wage/income gap (31.5% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 28.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 83.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (11.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 68.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (10.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 68.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 22.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 25.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 49.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (3.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 46.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.4% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.3% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (22.9% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 43.6%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 35.5%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.5%), family households (67.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and currently married (51.8% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 110.1%), master's degree (22.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 107.3%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 90.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 55.9%), ambulatory disability (4.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 47.1%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age over 75 (45.2% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 13.6%).