Czech vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czech
Immigrants from Micronesia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechs
Immigrants from Micronesia
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia Integration in Czech Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,567,765 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.251. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 27.7 Immigrants from Micronesia.
Czech vs Immigrants from Micronesia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $47,177, a difference of 19.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,525 compared to $80,544, a difference of 19.8%), and wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $61,000, a difference of 0.40%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $50,691, a difference of 1.4%), and median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $35,477, a difference of 9.9%).
Income Metric | Czech | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,595 | Tragic $37,464 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,839 | Tragic $90,345 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,164 | Tragic $75,574 |
Median Earnings | Good $47,221 | Tragic $41,133 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,546 | Tragic $47,177 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,992 | Tragic $35,477 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,421 | Tragic $50,691 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,525 | Tragic $80,544 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,507 | Tragic $87,864 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,244 | Average $61,000 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.2% | Exceptional 24.4% |
Czech vs Immigrants from Micronesia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 46.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 36.5%), and family poverty (7.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.040%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.1%).
Poverty Metric | Czech | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 13.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.9% | Tragic 15.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Tragic 19.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.8% | Tragic 18.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 18.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 18.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Tragic 23.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 18.6% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.9% | Tragic 31.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.0% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Czech vs Immigrants from Micronesia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 32.5%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.1%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 5.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Czech | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.3% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Average 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.6% |
Czech vs Immigrants from Micronesia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czech | Immigrants from Micronesia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Tragic 78.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.6% | Exceptional 40.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.5% | Exceptional 77.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.5% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 83.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.9% | Tragic 81.1% |
Czech vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 21.8%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and married-couple households (49.4% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.34%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Czech | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Average 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.5% | Fair 27.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.4% | Tragic 44.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 6.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.9% | Tragic 45.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Poor 32.9% |
Czech vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 46.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 8.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czech | Immigrants from Micronesia |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.3% | Good 90.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.5% | Fair 55.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.5% | Exceptional 20.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Czech vs Immigrants from Micronesia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.1%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 40.1%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.62%).
Education Level Metric | Czech | Immigrants from Micronesia |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Average 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Fair 94.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Fair 93.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Poor 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.2% | Poor 90.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.6% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Tragic 84.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 61.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.6% | Tragic 54.8% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.2% | Tragic 40.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 38.0% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.7% | Tragic 10.8% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.3% |
Czech vs Immigrants from Micronesia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 54.2%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.44%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 3.3%).
Disability Metric | Czech | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Disability | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.0% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.3% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 26.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.7% | Tragic 50.1% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |