Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Immigrants from Micronesia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Immigrants from Micronesia
7,346
SOCIAL INDEX
70.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
121st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia Integration in Immigrants from Northern Africa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,607,152 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.610. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.426% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to an increase of 425.9 Immigrants from Micronesia.
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from Micronesia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,531 compared to $37,464, a difference of 24.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,232 compared to $80,544, a difference of 23.2%), and median male earnings ($58,008 compared to $47,177, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,522 compared to $61,000, a difference of 2.5%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $50,691, a difference of 4.9%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,531 | Tragic $37,464 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,161 | Tragic $90,345 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,026 | Tragic $75,574 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $49,648 | Tragic $41,133 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $58,008 | Tragic $47,177 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,084 | Tragic $35,477 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,185 | Tragic $50,691 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,232 | Tragic $80,544 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $105,430 | Tragic $87,864 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,522 | Average $61,000 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.2% | Exceptional 24.4% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from Micronesia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 25.7%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 22.9%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.3%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Poverty | Good 12.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
| Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 9.8% |
| Males | Average 11.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
| Females | Good 13.2% | Tragic 14.6% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Tragic 20.7% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 15.8% |
| Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.4% | Tragic 19.4% |
| Children Under 16 years | Good 15.8% | Tragic 18.0% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Tragic 18.3% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Tragic 18.0% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Tragic 23.0% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 18.6% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 31.6% |
| Married Couples | Average 5.2% | Poor 5.5% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Average 11.0% | Good 10.7% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from Micronesia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 23.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Fair 5.3% |
| Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
| Females | Good 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
| Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Excellent 11.4% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.4% | Average 17.6% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Good 6.6% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.0% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Tragic 5.5% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
| Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Tragic 5.4% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Fair 8.8% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Excellent 7.4% | Tragic 9.1% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Average 8.9% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.4% | Poor 5.6% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from Micronesia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.7%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.6% | Tragic 64.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Tragic 78.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.9% | Exceptional 40.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Exceptional 77.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 83.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 82.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 83.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 81.1% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.9%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 11.4%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (46.5% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Average 64.2% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Fair 27.2% |
| Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Tragic 44.9% |
| Average Family Size | Average 3.22 | Exceptional 3.32 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
| Single Mother Households | Good 6.2% | Tragic 6.9% |
| Currently Married | Fair 46.5% | Tragic 45.6% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.5% | Poor 32.9% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 34.0%), no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 24.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 16.7%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.6% | Good 10.1% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.4% | Good 90.1% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.3% | Fair 55.1% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 20.7% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from Micronesia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 58.6%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 57.2%), and professional degree (5.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.7% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.050%), 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and 7th grade (95.8% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Average 2.1% |
| Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Average 98.0% |
| Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Average 98.0% |
| 1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Average 97.9% |
| 2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Average 97.9% |
| 3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Average 97.8% |
| 4th Grade | Poor 97.4% | Average 97.5% |
| 5th Grade | Poor 97.2% | Average 97.3% |
| 6th Grade | Poor 96.9% | Average 97.0% |
| 7th Grade | Fair 95.8% | Fair 95.9% |
| 8th Grade | Fair 95.5% | Fair 95.6% |
| 9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Fair 94.7% |
| 10th Grade | Average 93.7% | Fair 93.5% |
| 11th Grade | Average 92.6% | Poor 92.2% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.4% | Poor 90.6% |
| High School Diploma | Good 89.4% | Poor 88.6% |
| GED/Equivalency | Good 86.3% | Tragic 84.7% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.2% | Tragic 61.5% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.9% | Tragic 54.8% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.7% | Tragic 40.2% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.9% | Tragic 30.4% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.3% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Immigrants from Micronesia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 32.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 25.6%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.6%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.2%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.0% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.3% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 12.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 26.1% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.7% | Tragic 50.1% |
| Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.4% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.6% |
| Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.1% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |