Fijian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,746,227 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.411. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.046% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 46.0 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $61,000, a difference of 7.4%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $47,177, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $80,544, a difference of 0.73%), median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $35,477, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $50,691, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 18.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (18.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.0%), single female poverty (23.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 34.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 0.68%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.0%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.35%), average family size (3.36 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 7.2%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.49%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 19.4%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.6%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.42%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 18.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.99%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.3%).