Immigrants from Fiji vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,979,837 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.406. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.132% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 131.7 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $80,544, a difference of 29.1%), median household income ($93,933 compared to $75,574, a difference of 24.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,952 compared to $87,864, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,795 compared to $61,000, a difference of 6.2%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $50,691, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 40.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 27.7%), and single male poverty (10.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 18.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.6% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 12.7%), family households with children (30.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.2% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.32, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 29.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 27.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 25.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 67.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2nd grade (96.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 23.5%), male disability (11.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 18.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 0.93%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.1%).