Choctaw vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Choctaw
Immigrants from Micronesia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Choctaw
Immigrants from Micronesia
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia Integration in Choctaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,759,286 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.069. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 24.6 Immigrants from Micronesia.
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Micronesia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 15.1%), householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $61,000, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $50,691, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $47,177, a difference of 1.2%), median earnings ($40,270 compared to $41,133, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $80,544, a difference of 3.0%).
Income Metric | Choctaw | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,999 | Tragic $37,464 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,835 | Tragic $90,345 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,947 | Tragic $75,574 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,270 | Tragic $41,133 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,729 | Tragic $47,177 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,775 | Tragic $35,477 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,450 | Tragic $50,691 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $78,168 | Tragic $80,544 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,287 | Tragic $87,864 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,060 | Average $61,000 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Exceptional 24.4% |
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Micronesia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (17.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 25.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 21.3%), and family poverty (11.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.73%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.9%).
Poverty Metric | Choctaw | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
Families | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.3% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 15.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.5% | Tragic 19.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 18.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Tragic 18.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Tragic 18.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 23.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 18.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Tragic 31.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.3% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Micronesia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.0%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Choctaw | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.0% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Average 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Poor 5.6% |
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Micronesia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 3.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Choctaw | Immigrants from Micronesia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.5% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.4% | Tragic 78.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 40.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Exceptional 77.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.0% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.4% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.5% | Tragic 83.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.2% | Tragic 81.1% |
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 12.2%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.99%), currently married (46.3% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Choctaw | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Average 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Fair 27.2% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Tragic 44.9% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.3% | Tragic 45.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.9% | Poor 32.9% |
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 28.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 7.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Choctaw | Immigrants from Micronesia |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.2% | Good 90.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.3% | Fair 55.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Exceptional 20.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Micronesia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and associate's degree (37.8% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.15%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.29%).
Education Level Metric | Choctaw | Immigrants from Micronesia |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Average 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.1% | Fair 94.7% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Fair 93.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Poor 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.8% | Poor 90.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.8% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 84.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Tragic 61.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.3% | Tragic 54.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.8% | Tragic 40.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.4% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 10.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.3% |
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Micronesia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 86.4%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 39.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.3%).
Disability Metric | Choctaw | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Disability | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.0% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 26.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.7% | Tragic 50.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.7% |