Australian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,228,437 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 3.545% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 3,544.7 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $37,464, a difference of 39.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,912 compared to $80,544, a difference of 34.0%), and median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $47,177, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $50,691, a difference of 6.0%), householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $61,000, a difference of 9.7%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 40.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.3%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.57%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 26.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 23.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.9%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (62.8% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.050%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 81.9%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 77.9%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 70.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 37.3%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.7%).