Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Micronesia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Oceania

Immigrants from Micronesia

Average
Fair
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Micronesia Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,609,499 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.903. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.949% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 948.8 Immigrants from Micronesia.
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Immigrants from Micronesia Communities

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,623 compared to $80,544, a difference of 21.2%), per capita income ($45,220 compared to $37,464, a difference of 20.7%), and median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $47,177, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 4.9%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $61,000, a difference of 5.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $50,691, a difference of 5.9%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Income
Income MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Micronesia
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,220
Tragic
$37,464
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,453
Tragic
$90,345
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,100
Tragic
$75,574
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,617
Tragic
$41,133
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,712
Tragic
$47,177
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,297
Tragic
$35,477
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,680
Tragic
$50,691
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,623
Tragic
$80,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,705
Tragic
$87,864
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,416
Average
$61,000
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.6%
Exceptional
24.4%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 20.4%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 18.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.6%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Micronesia
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Families
Good
8.7%
Tragic
9.8%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Average
13.3%
Tragic
14.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
15.8%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.9%
Tragic
19.4%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
18.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.0%
Tragic
18.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Tragic
18.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Tragic
23.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Mothers
Good
28.7%
Tragic
31.6%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.4%
Tragic
13.5%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 22.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Micronesia
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Average
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Good
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Poor
5.6%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.90%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Micronesia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.9%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Exceptional
77.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
83.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
81.1%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.5%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.88%), family households (64.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Micronesia
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Average
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Fair
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Tragic
44.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Tragic
45.6%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.6%
Poor
32.9%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.29%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.7%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Micronesia
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.5%
Fair
55.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.8%
Exceptional
20.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.6%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 41.7%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 41.2%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Micronesia
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Poor
97.8%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Average
97.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Fair
94.7%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Poor
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Poor
90.6%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.8%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.5%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Tragic
61.5%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
54.8%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Tragic
40.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.3%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Tragic
10.8%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 15.6%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.3%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.1%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaImmigrants from Micronesia
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
13.2%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Tragic
26.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Tragic
50.1%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Tragic
2.7%