French vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,591,677 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within French communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.598. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.215% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French corresponds to an increase of 215.2 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($55,350 compared to $47,177, a difference of 17.3%), wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and per capita income ($43,685 compared to $37,464, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,230 compared to $50,691, a difference of 1.1%), householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $61,000, a difference of 2.2%), and median female earnings ($38,457 compared to $35,477, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 26.5%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 26.1%), and family poverty (8.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.25%), single father poverty (18.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 14.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.2%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.32, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.29%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.68%), and births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 35.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 36.2%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 68.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.13%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and male disability (13.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.86%).