Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Micronesia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Immigrants from Micronesia

Tragic
Fair
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Micronesia Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,306,596 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 27.8 Immigrants from Micronesia.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from Micronesia Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Micronesia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($72,193 compared to $90,345, a difference of 25.1%), householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $61,000, a difference of 24.2%), and per capita income ($30,256 compared to $37,464, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $35,477, a difference of 6.8%), wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $50,691, a difference of 12.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Micronesia Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Micronesia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Tragic
$37,464
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Tragic
$90,345
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Tragic
$75,574
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Tragic
$41,133
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Tragic
$47,177
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Tragic
$35,477
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Tragic
$50,691
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Tragic
$80,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Tragic
$87,864
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Average
$61,000
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
24.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Micronesia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 108.5%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 104.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 94.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 18.4%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 36.3%), and single female poverty (34.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 48.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Micronesia Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Micronesia
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
9.8%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
14.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
15.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Tragic
19.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
18.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
18.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
18.0%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
23.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
31.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
13.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Micronesia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 102.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 84.3%), and male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 82.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Micronesia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Micronesia
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Poor
5.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Micronesia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 28.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 7.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Micronesia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Micronesia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
77.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
83.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Tragic
81.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 51.6%), single father households (3.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 49.0%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.8%), family households (67.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Micronesia
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Average
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Fair
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Tragic
44.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Tragic
45.6%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Poor
32.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 54.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 6.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 10.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 10.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Micronesia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Fair
55.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
20.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Micronesia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (31.8% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 26.5%), bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and college, under 1 year (52.8% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Micronesia Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Micronesia
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Average
97.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Fair
94.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Poor
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Poor
90.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Tragic
61.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Tragic
54.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Tragic
40.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
10.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Micronesia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 117.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 38.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.12%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Micronesia Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Micronesia
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
13.2%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Tragic
26.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Tragic
50.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.7%