Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,831,979 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to an increase of 16.0 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $80,544, a difference of 48.4%), per capita income ($53,874 compared to $37,464, a difference of 43.8%), and median male earnings ($66,078 compared to $47,177, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 8.2%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $50,691, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $61,000, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 43.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 41.7%), and receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 44.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.4%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 26.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 34.7%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.6%), and births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 39.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 3.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 116.0%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 101.5%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 90.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.080%), 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and 3rd grade (97.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 45.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 34.4%), and male disability (9.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 0.31%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 7.7%).