New Zealander vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,196,317 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.196. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.305% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to a decrease of 305.5 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $37,464, a difference of 35.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $80,544, a difference of 30.5%), and median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $47,177, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $50,691, a difference of 5.1%), householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $61,000, a difference of 10.4%), and wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 36.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.96%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 22.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.48%), family households (62.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.040%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 85.9%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 84.0%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 69.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 8.5%).