Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Immigrants from Micronesia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Immigrants from Micronesia
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,044,802 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.626. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.041% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to a decrease of 40.5 Immigrants from Micronesia.
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Micronesia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $61,000, a difference of 12.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $80,544, a difference of 11.3%), and per capita income ($41,195 compared to $37,464, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($92,837 compared to $90,345, a difference of 2.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $87,864, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $50,691, a difference of 6.0%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,195 | Tragic $37,464 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $92,837 | Tragic $90,345 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $80,341 | Tragic $75,574 |
| Median Earnings | Tragic $44,462 | Tragic $41,133 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,474 | Tragic $47,177 |
| Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,644 | Tragic $35,477 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,722 | Tragic $50,691 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $89,673 | Tragic $80,544 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $91,462 | Tragic $87,864 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,030 | Average $61,000 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.5% | Exceptional 24.4% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Micronesia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 41.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 34.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 0.77%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and single female poverty (22.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 4.5%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Poverty | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 13.4% |
| Families | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 9.8% |
| Males | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.2% |
| Females | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 14.6% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 20.7% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 15.8% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 19.4% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.4% | Tragic 18.0% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 18.3% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 18.0% |
| Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
| Single Females | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 23.0% |
| Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Tragic 18.6% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 31.3% | Tragic 31.6% |
| Married Couples | Tragic 6.7% | Poor 5.5% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.4% | Good 10.7% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Micronesia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 38.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.8%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 5.3% |
| Males | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
| Females | Tragic 6.4% | Good 5.2% |
| Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.4% | Excellent 11.4% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.9% | Average 17.6% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Good 6.6% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.0% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
| Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.4% |
| Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.5% | Fair 8.8% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Tragic 9.1% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.2% | Average 8.9% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.6% | Poor 5.6% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Micronesia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 29.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 64.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 78.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 40.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Exceptional 77.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 83.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 82.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Tragic 83.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Tragic 81.1% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 7.0%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.040%), family households (64.8% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.90%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Family Households | Exceptional 64.8% | Average 64.2% |
| Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Fair 27.2% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.9% | Tragic 44.9% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Exceptional 3.32 |
| Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Tragic 45.6% |
| Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 12.7% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.7% | Poor 32.9% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 136.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 78.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 18.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 36.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 54.8%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 23.8% | Good 10.1% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 76.2% | Good 90.1% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 40.5% | Fair 55.1% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 20.7% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Micronesia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 47.5%), master's degree (13.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 26.2%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Average 2.1% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 96.9% | Average 98.0% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Average 98.0% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Average 97.9% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Average 97.9% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Average 97.8% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Average 97.5% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 95.8% | Average 97.3% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Average 97.0% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 93.7% | Fair 95.9% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 93.3% | Fair 95.6% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Fair 94.7% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 90.4% | Fair 93.5% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 89.1% | Poor 92.2% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.5% | Poor 90.6% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 84.8% | Poor 88.6% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.0% | Tragic 84.7% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 58.7% | Tragic 61.5% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.4% | Tragic 54.8% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.2% | Tragic 40.2% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.7% | Tragic 30.4% |
| Master's Degree | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 10.8% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.3% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Micronesia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 47.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.9%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.6%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.1%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.0% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.3% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.7% | Tragic 26.1% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Tragic 50.1% |
| Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 3.6% |
| Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Tragic 18.1% |
| Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
| Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |