Eastern European vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,799,004 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Eastern European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.847. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Eastern Europeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.206% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Eastern Europeans corresponds to an increase of 1,206.4 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,780 compared to $37,464, a difference of 48.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($114,523 compared to $80,544, a difference of 42.2%), and median male earnings ($66,472 compared to $47,177, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,066 compared to $50,691, a difference of 6.7%), householder income over 65 years ($70,470 compared to $61,000, a difference of 15.5%), and wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 47.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 36.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 26.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 32.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.1%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.32, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 28.1%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 0.49%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 119.2%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 109.4%), and master's degree (21.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 96.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 36.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 29.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 11.9%).