Houma vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,824,989 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.354% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 353.6 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 58.1%), householder income over 65 years ($44,822 compared to $61,000, a difference of 36.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $87,864, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,044 compared to $80,544, a difference of 4.5%), median earnings ($38,949 compared to $41,133, a difference of 5.6%), and median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $47,177, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 73.3%), family poverty (14.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 49.4%), and single female poverty (33.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 17.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 42.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 39.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 41.6%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.3%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.5% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 0.20%), married-couple households (44.6% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and family households (65.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 54.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 29.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 46.0%), associate's degree (28.2% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 42.5%), and bachelor's degree (21.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.63%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 85.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 54.2%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.6%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.8%), and disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 12.1%).