Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,851,986 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.310. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.097% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 97.4 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($57,145 compared to $47,177, a difference of 21.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $87,864, a difference of 20.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $80,544, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $50,691, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $61,000, a difference of 3.4%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 28.1%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 26.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.9%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.8%), and births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.3%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 51.0%), master's degree (16.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 49.9%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 26.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 24.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.4%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.3%).