Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Micronesia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Micronesia
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,800,772 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.532. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.133% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 133.0 Immigrants from Micronesia.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Micronesia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,000, a difference of 13.5%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,691, a difference of 13.2%), and wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,672 compared to $41,133, a difference of 1.1%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $47,177, a difference of 1.4%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $37,464, a difference of 2.7%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $37,464 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $90,345 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $75,574 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $41,133 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $47,177 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $35,477 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,691 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $80,544 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $87,864 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Average $61,000 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 24.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Micronesia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 20.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 18.5%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.32%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 15.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 19.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 18.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 18.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 23.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 18.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 31.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Micronesia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.73%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Average 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Poor 5.6% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Micronesia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 2.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Micronesia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 40.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 12.1%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 10.4%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.26%), currently married (46.6% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Average 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Fair 27.2% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 44.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 45.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Poor 32.9% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 28.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 7.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Micronesia |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Good 90.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Fair 55.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 20.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Micronesia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 23.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Micronesia |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Average 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Fair 94.7% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Fair 93.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Poor 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Poor 90.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 61.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 54.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 40.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 10.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Micronesia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 73.1%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 34.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.1%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.0% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 26.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 50.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.7% |