Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,300,282 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.111. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 7.7 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,520 compared to $80,544, a difference of 36.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $87,864, a difference of 34.0%), and per capita income ($49,894 compared to $37,464, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 10.4%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $50,691, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $61,000, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 46.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 45.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 36.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.3%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.4%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.16%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (65.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 72.3%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 68.1%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 59.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 31.3%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 6.4%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.0%).