Scottish vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,576,598 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.603. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.535% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 535.0 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 19.2%), per capita income ($44,440 compared to $37,464, a difference of 18.6%), and median male earnings ($55,793 compared to $47,177, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $50,691, a difference of 0.27%), householder income over 65 years ($61,735 compared to $61,000, a difference of 1.2%), and median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $35,477, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 36.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.6%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.97%), single male poverty (14.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.0%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.5%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and married-couple households (49.0% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.37%), family households (64.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 49.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 47.9%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 47.2%), and master's degree (15.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.68%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 63.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.4%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.4%).