Norwegian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,162,156 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.628. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.213% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 213.4 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,866 compared to $80,544, a difference of 20.3%), per capita income ($44,480 compared to $37,464, a difference of 18.7%), and median male earnings ($55,965 compared to $47,177, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $61,000, a difference of 0.17%), householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $50,691, a difference of 4.8%), and median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $35,477, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 50.8%), married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 47.7%), and family poverty (6.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.36%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and single female poverty (20.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 37.5%), unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 15.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 25.8%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.42%), family households (63.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 56.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 4.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 55.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 36.5%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.76%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 66.8%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 18.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.8%).