Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Immigrants from Micronesia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Immigrants from Micronesia
1,504
SOCIAL INDEX
12.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
304th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia Integration in Immigrants from Guatemala Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,419,255 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.055. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to a decrease of 5.5 Immigrants from Micronesia.
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Micronesia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $61,000, a difference of 13.1%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and median family income ($87,191 compared to $90,345, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $35,477, a difference of 0.090%), per capita income ($37,550 compared to $37,464, a difference of 0.23%), and median household income ($75,123 compared to $75,574, a difference of 0.60%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,550 | Tragic $37,464 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $87,191 | Tragic $90,345 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $75,123 | Tragic $75,574 |
| Median Earnings | Tragic $40,851 | Tragic $41,133 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,244 | Tragic $47,177 |
| Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,444 | Tragic $35,477 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,447 | Tragic $50,691 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $81,341 | Tragic $80,544 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,573 | Tragic $87,864 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,950 | Average $61,000 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.5% | Exceptional 24.4% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Micronesia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 32.0%), married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 31.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.0%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and single female poverty (24.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 4.7%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Poverty | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 13.4% |
| Families | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 9.8% |
| Males | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 12.2% |
| Females | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.6% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.9% | Tragic 20.7% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.6% | Tragic 15.8% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 19.4% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 18.0% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 18.3% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 18.0% |
| Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
| Single Females | Tragic 24.1% | Tragic 23.0% |
| Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Tragic 18.6% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 33.3% | Tragic 31.6% |
| Married Couples | Tragic 7.2% | Poor 5.5% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.8% | Good 10.7% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Micronesia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.9%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.27%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 5.3% |
| Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
| Females | Tragic 6.1% | Good 5.2% |
| Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Excellent 11.4% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.7% | Average 17.6% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Good 6.6% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.0% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
| Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.4% |
| Seniors > 75 | Good 8.7% | Fair 8.8% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.6% | Tragic 9.1% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Average 8.9% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.4% | Poor 5.6% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Micronesia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Tragic 64.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 78.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.3% | Exceptional 40.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Exceptional 77.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 83.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 82.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 83.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.1% | Tragic 81.1% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.6%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 14.0%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.41 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.0%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Average 64.2% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.8% | Fair 27.2% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.8% | Tragic 44.9% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.41 | Exceptional 3.32 |
| Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 6.9% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 45.6% |
| Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.5% | Poor 32.9% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 10.9%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 5.1%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.2% | Good 10.1% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.9% | Good 90.1% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.5% | Fair 55.1% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Exceptional 20.7% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Micronesia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 71.0%), college, under 1 year (56.2% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and high school diploma (81.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.8% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 1.2%), nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.6% | Average 2.1% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 96.4% | Average 98.0% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 96.4% | Average 98.0% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Average 97.9% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Average 97.9% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 95.8% | Average 97.8% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Average 97.5% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 94.6% | Average 97.3% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Average 97.0% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 91.3% | Fair 95.9% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 90.7% | Fair 95.6% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 89.4% | Fair 94.7% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 87.4% | Fair 93.5% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 85.8% | Poor 92.2% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.0% | Poor 90.6% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 81.4% | Poor 88.6% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.9% | Tragic 84.7% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 61.5% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.7% | Tragic 54.8% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.1% | Tragic 40.2% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.8% | Tragic 30.4% |
| Master's Degree | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 10.8% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.3% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Micronesia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 30.5%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 21.8%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.38%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 13.2% |
| Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
| Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.0% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.3% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 12.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 26.1% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.1% | Tragic 50.1% |
| Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.4% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.6% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 18.1% |
| Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
| Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |