Immigrants from Brazil vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,101,741 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.097% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to an increase of 97.0 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,164 compared to $37,464, a difference of 28.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,534 compared to $80,544, a difference of 24.8%), and median male earnings ($58,324 compared to $47,177, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,364 compared to $61,000, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $50,691, a difference of 7.5%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 24.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 23.8%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 21.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.9%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.55%), family households (63.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 44.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 21.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.60%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 64.0%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 63.5%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 61.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 37.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 26.9%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.66%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.2%).