Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,007,241 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.748. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.658% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 657.6 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $37,464, a difference of 23.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $80,544, a difference of 20.6%), and median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $47,177, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $61,000, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $50,691, a difference of 3.5%), and wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 21.3%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 18.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 24.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.29%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.0%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.50%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 24.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 62.7%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 56.2%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 55.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.060%), 2nd grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 29.5%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 27.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.4%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.8%).