Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Latvia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Micronesia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Latvia

Immigrants from Micronesia

Excellent
Fair
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Micronesia Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,163,297 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.295. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.090% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to a decrease of 89.6 Immigrants from Micronesia.
Immigrants from Latvia Integration in Immigrants from Micronesia Communities

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $37,464, a difference of 35.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,522 compared to $80,544, a difference of 31.0%), and median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $47,177, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $50,691, a difference of 2.1%), householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $61,000, a difference of 5.4%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 9.4%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from Micronesia
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,914
Tragic
$37,464
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,826
Tragic
$90,345
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,602
Tragic
$75,574
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,555
Tragic
$41,133
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,422
Tragic
$47,177
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,099
Tragic
$35,477
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,737
Tragic
$50,691
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,522
Tragic
$80,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,454
Tragic
$87,864
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,298
Average
$61,000
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
24.4%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 30.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 26.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.1%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from Micronesia
Poverty
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
9.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
14.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
15.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
19.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
18.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Tragic
18.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
18.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
23.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
31.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
13.5%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 34.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from Micronesia
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Poor
5.6%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.3%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from Micronesia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.8%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Exceptional
77.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.9%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
81.1%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.8%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 25.6%), and births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.7% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 2.4%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (62.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.6%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from Micronesia
Family Households
Tragic
62.0%
Average
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.9%
Fair
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Tragic
44.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Tragic
45.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.1%
Poor
32.9%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 37.9%), no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 19.3%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from Micronesia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.1%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.1%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.2%
Fair
55.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
20.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
7.6%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 80.4%), master's degree (19.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 77.0%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 76.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from Micronesia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Average
97.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Fair
94.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Poor
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Poor
90.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.1%
Tragic
61.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.8%
Tragic
54.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.8%
Tragic
40.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
10.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 27.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 23.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.4%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.1%).
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Micronesia Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LatviaImmigrants from Micronesia
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.2%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.6%
Tragic
26.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
50.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%