Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,366,510 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Immigrant from Southern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Southern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Southern Europe corresponds to an increase of 18.9 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,486 compared to $60,305, a difference of 71.6%), median household income ($91,605 compared to $54,644, a difference of 67.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,775 compared to $65,113, a difference of 65.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 23.9%), median female earnings ($42,275 compared to $32,500, a difference of 30.1%), and median earnings ($50,280 compared to $36,876, a difference of 36.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 106.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 105.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.6% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 104.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 52.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 55.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 62.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 83.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 66.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 55.1%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 50.0%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.32, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 53.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 29.1%), and no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 104.5%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 86.7%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 79.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 64.4%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 59.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.2%).