Blackfeet vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,557,616 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.399. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to an increase of 24.7 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $34,584, a difference of 40.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,531 compared to $60,305, a difference of 35.2%), and median household income ($73,509 compared to $54,644, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,864 compared to $32,500, a difference of 10.3%), median earnings ($41,822 compared to $36,876, a difference of 13.4%), and median male earnings ($48,402 compared to $41,715, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.5% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 62.3%), receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 60.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.2% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 30.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 31.5%), and single female poverty (25.1% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 31.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 58.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 46.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 25.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 27.1%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 21.6%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.85%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.3%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 25.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 0.90%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.94%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 41.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 38.1%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.0% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.040%), 5th grade (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and 6th grade (97.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 33.8%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 28.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 8.2%).