French Canadian vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,095,011 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.818. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 28.7 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $60,305, a difference of 55.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $34,584, a difference of 52.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $65,113, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $32,500, a difference of 18.3%), median earnings ($46,026 compared to $36,876, a difference of 24.8%), and median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $41,715, a difference of 31.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 108.9%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 101.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 100.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 40.3%), single female poverty (22.2% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 48.9%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 53.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 64.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 59.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 40.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 19.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 50.6%), births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 40.1%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.61%), family households (63.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.99%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 32.9%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 31.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 63.6%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 63.0%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 48.8%), ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 42.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.5%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.7%).