African vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,765,656 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.703. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Africans corresponds to an increase of 28.9 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between African and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($46,838 compared to $34,584, a difference of 35.4%), median household income ($72,650 compared to $54,644, a difference of 33.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,711 compared to $40,550, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 7.6%), median female earnings ($36,530 compared to $32,500, a difference of 12.4%), and median earnings ($41,955 compared to $36,876, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between African and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 70.8%), single father poverty (18.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 55.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.3% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 30.0%), single female poverty (24.8% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 33.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.8% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 36.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between African and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 50.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 48.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between African and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 22.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between African and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 21.4%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.2%), and single mother households (8.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between African and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 50.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 27.4%), and no vehicles in household (12.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 7.8%), and no vehicles in household (12.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between African and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 49.1%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.0%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.13%), 8th grade (95.4% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between African and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 36.9%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 34.9%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.58%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.6%).