Immigrants from Central America vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,586,200 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.277. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 3.3 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $34,584, a difference of 47.5%), median household income ($74,217 compared to $54,644, a difference of 35.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,012 compared to $60,305, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,953 compared to $32,500, a difference of 4.5%), median earnings ($39,762 compared to $36,876, a difference of 7.8%), and median male earnings ($45,538 compared to $41,715, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.8% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 82.9%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 77.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 12.2%), single mother poverty (33.6% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 28.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 31.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 55.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 50.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 14.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 28.7%), family households with children (31.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 17.7%), and married-couple households (45.7% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.2%), average family size (3.49 compared to 3.32, a difference of 5.2%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 15.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 138.7%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and bachelor's degree (27.5% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (54.4% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 0.41%), college, 1 year or more (48.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.78%), and kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 53.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 48.5%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.8%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 11.3%).