Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,307,238 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.310. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.080% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 80.1 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $60,305, a difference of 77.2%), median household income ($95,319 compared to $54,644, a difference of 74.4%), and per capita income ($51,770 compared to $29,845, a difference of 73.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 27.9%), median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $32,500, a difference of 34.1%), and median earnings ($52,361 compared to $36,876, a difference of 42.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 137.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 125.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 122.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 58.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 62.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 68.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 96.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 70.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 59.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 71.0%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 69.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.27%), family households (63.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.32, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 52.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 25.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 136.4%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 116.9%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 100.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.040%), 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 77.0%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 67.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.7%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.1%).