Tohono O'odham vs Lumbee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lumbee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Lumbee

Tragic
Poor
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,002
SOCIAL INDEX
17.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
276th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lumbee Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,788,609 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.077% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 76.6 Lumbee.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Lumbee Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Lumbee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $34,584, a difference of 30.8%), householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $40,550, a difference of 21.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($69,068 compared to $60,305, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($30,256 compared to $29,845, a difference of 1.4%), median earnings ($36,349 compared to $36,876, a difference of 1.5%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $32,500, a difference of 2.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Lumbee Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamLumbee
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Tragic
$29,845
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Tragic
$68,679
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Tragic
$54,644
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Tragic
$36,876
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Tragic
$41,715
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Tragic
$32,500
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Tragic
$34,584
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Tragic
$60,305
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Tragic
$65,113
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Tragic
$40,550
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
21.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Lumbee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 34.5%), single father poverty (22.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 29.4%), and family poverty (20.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 0.16%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (31.6% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Lumbee Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamLumbee
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
17.0%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
20.2%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
23.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
31.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
26.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Tragic
33.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
31.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
31.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
30.7%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
25.2%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
33.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
28.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
43.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
8.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
18.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
19.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
22.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Lumbee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 90.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 56.8%), and male unemployment (10.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Lumbee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamLumbee
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Tragic
19.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
11.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
13.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
7.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Lumbee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.61%).
Tohono O'odham vs Lumbee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamLumbee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
56.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Tragic
70.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
31.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Tragic
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
78.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Tragic
75.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Lumbee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 37.6%), currently married (36.8% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.36%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and married-couple households (37.9% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 4.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Lumbee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamLumbee
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
63.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.3%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Tragic
39.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Tragic
39.8%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Tragic
48.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Lumbee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 51.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 32.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 22.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Lumbee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamLumbee
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Average
10.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Good
55.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
23.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
8.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Lumbee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 52.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 33.9%), and professional degree (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.62%), 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.64%).
Tohono O'odham vs Lumbee Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamLumbee
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Excellent
96.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Tragic
91.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Tragic
88.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
85.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
83.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
80.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Tragic
54.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Tragic
48.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Tragic
34.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
24.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Lumbee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 62.3%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.74%), disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Lumbee Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamLumbee
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
15.5%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
15.2%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
17.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Tragic
32.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Tragic
56.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
19.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
9.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
3.0%