Norwegian vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,791,358 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.211. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to a decrease of 3.3 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,866 compared to $60,305, a difference of 60.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $65,113, a difference of 59.2%), and median household income ($86,084 compared to $54,644, a difference of 57.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $32,500, a difference of 19.4%), median earnings ($46,865 compared to $36,876, a difference of 27.1%), and median male earnings ($55,965 compared to $41,715, a difference of 34.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 155.8%), family poverty (6.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 146.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.2% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 142.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 49.8%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 52.3%), and single female poverty (20.8% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 58.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 91.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 87.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 61.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 49.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 22.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 66.5%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 64.3%), and currently married (50.2% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 60.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 12.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 70.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 68.8%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 65.3%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 61.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 11.3%).