Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,801,146 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.804. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.409% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to an increase of 408.9 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($90,026 compared to $54,644, a difference of 64.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,232 compared to $60,305, a difference of 64.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,430 compared to $65,113, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 18.3%), median female earnings ($42,084 compared to $32,500, a difference of 29.5%), and median earnings ($49,648 compared to $36,876, a difference of 34.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 110.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 108.6%), and receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 108.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 54.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 57.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 58.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 85.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 79.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 64.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 16.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 63.3%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 47.2%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.74%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 55.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 30.2%), and no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 21.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 105.6%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 94.5%), and master's degree (17.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 84.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.7% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.40%), 8th grade (95.5% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and 4th grade (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 71.6%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 67.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 67.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 10.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.2%).