Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,437,078 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($106,057 compared to $54,644, a difference of 94.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($116,626 compared to $60,305, a difference of 93.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($124,188 compared to $65,113, a difference of 90.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 37.5%), median female earnings ($46,324 compared to $32,500, a difference of 42.5%), and median earnings ($57,114 compared to $36,876, a difference of 54.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 159.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.7% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 152.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 151.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (25.3% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 71.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 73.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 76.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 108.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 85.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 64.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 95.3%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 68.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.8%), family households (66.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and family households with children (30.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 43.6%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 20.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 141.3%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 139.6%), and master's degree (20.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 123.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.1% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.080%), 7th grade (96.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and 5th grade (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 99.2%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 89.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 86.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.9%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 31.1%).