Ecuadorian vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,785,297 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.535. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 21.9 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $34,584, a difference of 55.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $60,305, a difference of 51.8%), and median household income ($82,070 compared to $54,644, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 7.4%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $32,500, a difference of 20.4%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $36,876, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 101.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 83.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 73.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 25.4%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 28.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 29.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 74.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 56.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 44.9%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 26.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.080%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 120.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 96.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 64.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 15.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 33.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 64.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 95.2%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 59.2%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (89.6% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.74%), 10th grade (90.6% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 65.2%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 63.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.1%).